SKU: 33371033554

gas audio power gas mad level 2 vierkanalverstarker fur auto soundsysteme und hochwertige klangqualitat

Sale price$92.93 Regular price$103.26
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $25.82 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 3 - Aug 8

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

gas audio power gas mad level 2 vierkanalverstarker fur auto soundsysteme und hochwertige klangqualitatGas Mad Level 2 Vierkanalverstrker fr Auto Soundsysteme und hochwertige Klangqualitt Bereit Hand im gesunden Menschenverstand und gehen Sie vollstndig fr verrckt mit den Verstrkern aus der A2 Serie. Wir haben eine Reihe von "coolen" Auswahlmglichkeiten im Gebiet der Belftung getroffen, wie z. Schwierige Montagebedingungen. Lass die Hasser an Inspiriert von den fast perfekten Max Verstrkern, entschieden wir, dass es eine Funktion gab, die wir in den

Gas Mad Level 2 Vierkanalverstärker für Auto -Soundsysteme und hochwertige Klangqualität

Bereit
Hand im gesunden Menschenverstand und gehen Sie vollständig für verrückt mit den Verstärkern aus der A2 -Serie. Wir haben eine Reihe von "coolen" Auswahlmöglichkeiten im Gebiet der Belüftung getroffen, wie z. Schwierige Montagebedingungen.

Lass die Hasser an
Inspiriert von den fast perfekten Max -Verstärkern, entschieden wir, dass es eine Funktion gab, die wir in den verrückten Verstärkern nur aufnehmen mussten: die ausgewogenen Differentialeingänge, was weniger Lärm und einen besseren Klang bedeutet. Die leistungsstarke Klasse AB Strikertopology stellt sicher, dass die A285.2 sowohl Kraft als auch einen reibungslosen Klang liefert. Dies ist ein Verstärker in voller Reichweite, also werfen Sie alles, was Sie haben. Wir unterstützen Sie, also machen Sie es und machen Sie uns stolz!

Für jeden etwas dabei
Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Ihrem Soundsystem und dem Rest? Nun, abgesehen von großartigen Mengen an Macht ... Natürlich die Kontrolle! Wir haben die MAD A2 -Serie HPF, BPF und LPF 12 dB Crossovers mit einer Vielzahl von Funktionen gegeben. Bauen Sie das System Ihrer Träume auf, die Wahl liegt bei Ihnen, aber stellen Sie sicher, dass es so laut wie möglich ist!

Einfach zu installieren seit 1997
Sie möchten diesen Verstärker so schnell wie möglich installieren, und wir machen es einfach, ihn einzurichten. Wie wäre es mit einer Clip -Funktion, mit der Sie wissen, wann 1% Verzerrung erreicht wurde? Wir haben auch die neueste Eingangstechnologie für hohe Niveaus mit hinzugefügt
ATO, automatisch einschalten.

Sicherheit zuerst
Wenn Sie etwas eng sind, kann es schief gehen. Dies ist etwas, das Sie um jeden Preis vermeiden möchten, oder? Genau deshalb haben wir fortgeschrittene Sicherheitsschaltungen eingeführt. Dies minimiert das Risiko von DC, thermischen Problemen, Überlastung und Kurzschluss!
Komponente
Verstärker

Komponente: Verstärker
Eingabemodus: 2Ch / 4Ch
Power RMS (2 Ohm): 4x120w
Power RMS (4 Ohm): 4x85w
Brückenleistung RMS (4 Ohm): 1x240W
Freq. Antwort: 1525.000 Hz
Niedriger Passfilter: 504.000 Hz
Hochpassfilter: 154.000 Hz
S/N -Verhältnis (gewahrt):> 100 dB
Bass EQ: 012DB @45Hz
Crossover -Steigung: 12 dB
Leistungsspannung: 1016V
REM -Spannung: 1016V
Eingangsempfindlichkeit: 0,56 V
T.H.D: <0,2%
Power Fuse: 2x40a
Dämpfungsfaktor:> 130
Eingang mit hoher Ebene: Ja
RCA -Linie aus: Ja

Geeignet für:

4 Kanal

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 33371033554

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 6 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
R
Verified Purchase
RC Mom
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Good experience
Format: Paperback
It was all good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2025

recommand products