SKU: 99612920056

Winter-Daunenschlafsack — Gänsedaune 400/600/800/1000/1200 g

Sale price$89.10 Regular price$99.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $24.75 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Winter-Daunenschlafsack — Gänsedaune 400/600/800/1000/1200 gFeatures: Stoff:: 400T nylon ripstop and Wasserdicht Lining: 400T nylon breathable perspiration Zipper: YKKFilling: 95%Weie Gnsedaune Bauschigkeit:: 800+Technische Daten:: 210X80X50cm The sleeping bag adopts the vertical lining process, so that the Gnsedaune is evenly distributed, which increases the Bauschigkeit: Gnsedaune and makes it more comfortable and warm. We use a new vertical lining process to improve the down channel inside the sleeping bag,

Features:

Stoff:: 400T nylon ripstop and Wasserdicht

Lining: 400T nylon breathable perspiration

Zipper: YKKFilling: 95%Weiße Gänsedaune

Bauschigkeit:: 800+Technische Daten:: 210X80X50cm

The sleeping bag adopts the vertical lining process, so that the Gänsedaune is evenly distributed, which increases the Bauschigkeit: Gänsedaune and makes it more comfortable and warm.

We use a new vertical lining process to improve the down channel inside the sleeping bag, improve the warmth of the sleeping bag, and reduce the Gewicht: of the sleeping bag.

Gewicht: Technische Daten:: The Füllung: Kapazität: of Gänsedaune is 400 grams, and the total Gewicht: of the sleeping bag is 870 grams.The Füllung: Kapazität: of Gänsedaune is 600 grams, and the total Gewicht: of the sleeping bag is 1070 grams.

The Füllung: Kapazität: of Gänsedaune is 800 grams, and the total Gewicht: of the sleeping bag is 1290 grams.The Füllung: Kapazität: of Gänsedaune is 1000 grams, and the total Gewicht: of the sleeping bag is 1500 grams.

The Füllung: Kapazität: of Gänsedaune is 1200 grams, and the total Gewicht: of the sleeping bag is 1700 grams.

 Please refer to the following table for temperature scale:
Measured temperature scale

Comfortable temperature

0~15℃

-5~10℃

-10~5℃

-15~0℃

-20~5℃

Limiting temperature

-5℃

-10℃

-15℃

-20℃

-25℃

Down Füllung: Gewicht:

400g

600g

800g

1000g

1200g

Down content

95% Weiße Gänsedaune

Sleeping bag Stoff:

400T nylon

colour

Black / Red / Navy / Lake Blue / Orange

zipper

YKK zipper

Sleeping bag Größe:

210x80x50cm   /   82.6x31.5x19.7in

Total Gewicht:

870g

1070g

1290g

1500g

1700g

Bag Größe:

18x21cm

20x23cm

22x25cm

24x27cm

26x29cm

Note: The above temperature scale is only for reference, and the specific temperature scale shall be determined according to individual constitution


📦 Versand & Lieferzeit

Aus DE/AT-Lager (versandfertig): 1–3 Werktage, DPD oder Hermes.
Streckenversand (direkt vom Großhändler): 10–18 Werktage. Für dieses Produkt wahrscheinlich Streckenversand — falls relevant für dich, bitte vor Bestellung kurz per [email protected] nachfragen.

Krisenshop ist ein Solo-Projekt von Florian Neuhuber aus Garsten/Oberösterreich. Lager wird laufend ausgebaut — wir kommunizieren transparent welche Artikel sofort und welche aus Streckenversand kommen.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 99612920056

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 30 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Judith Priddy
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
J
Jason Galbraith
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same. The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to. "Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025

recommand products