Pay in installments of $49.75 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Vintage Sentimental Signet Ring in 9 Carat Gold; Circa 1941Softened with love and time, this 1940s signet ring is a gorgeous jewel of buttery gold! This is a truly timeless piece of jewellery with a poignant message within. Dating to the end of the second World War, the surface of this ring has worn away crisp details to leave a wonderful patina of wear. We adore the traces left in its swirls and curves. With a blank panel this looks stunning as it is, or it could be personalised! Within in signet ring we
Softened with love and time, this 1940‘s signet ring is a gorgeous jewel of buttery gold! This is a truly timeless piece of jewellery with a poignant message within.Dating to the end of the second World War, the surface of this ring has worn away crisp details to leave a wonderful patina of wear. We adore the traces left in its swirls and curves. With a blank panel this looks stunning as it is, or it could be personalised!
Within in signet ring we have a lovely simple and sentimental message, an engraving simply reading ‘From Mam & Dad 15/9/46‘. Looking at the year this was made it is entirely possible this was a ring worn by a someone returning home from war.
Created from 9 carat gold means that its very durable and so ideal for lots of enjoyment and wear. Whilst the rich gold colouring shows the luxurious and quality of this jewel. This is a very special and truly timeless beauty
DETAILS
ERA: 1941
MEASUREMENTS: Finger size K 1/2 (UK/AU) 5.5 (US)
WEIGHT: 2.6 grams approximately
Rounded signet surface: 10 mm x 7.5 mm approximately
HALLMARKING: 9 - 375 (fineness of 9 carat gold) three towers (Chester assay office) Q (date letter 1941)
CONDITION: the ring is in vintage condition and ready to wear and complete any outfit. As expected there is a fine patina of wear across the face and surface of the gold ring.
If you have any questions about this or any other questions please get in touch & please note the box is for display only.
Please feel free to take a look at all photographs for condition before committing to buy. We do not offer refunds so if in doubt drop us and email and wed be happy to help!
-We ship worldwide on all orders & parcels are sent fully insured and well packed in our signature pink boxes
-We accept all methods of payment, and orders will be shipped out within 1-3 business days.
-All customs information is declared and we are not responsible for any import duties or delays incurred.
> All of the jewels we work with are antique or vintage and as such they are sold ‘as seen. This means theyre not perfect. They carry the love and journey of generations who love them before. These jewels should be worn with extra and love and care.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 27 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Very good product
Size: Medium, Color: (001) Black / Black / Pitch Gray
I purchased these to wear inside lowcut slip on casual shoes, I don't particularly like to not wear socks in my shoes for hygienic reasons. Prior to purchasing these socks, all I could find were those made of very light beige hosiery type material , and my slip on shoes would slide around a bit. These are light weight and breathable athletic type material, with a very good gripper strip at the heel. One pair of my slip on casual shoes have a particularly lower cut in the toe area, but the shoe is black and I chose the black color and though I see a hint of the sock there, it matches and does not detract from the look of the casual solid black shoe
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2026
★★★★★ 5
They stay out! No more sock wads!
Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray
Best no show socks ever made!!!!! I've been struggling for 2 years to find ones that actually stay on your foot, even other national brands, and I just became content wearing my sneakers without socks. They ALWAYS slid down into my show & I ended up walking on a wad of sock until I could fix it...or usually just took them off after a couple of tries. Enter Under Armor!!! They a mid weight, but not very thick & still breathable. They work too by actually staying on your foot! Not once have they slid down into my show!! Very comfortable but they could be a little more affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Love!
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray
Ive tried so many no show socks but I love these. This is the 3rd set I've bought. They never slip off and the material is thin and breathable. Perfect for working out.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
True no-show socks that don’t slide down!
Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray, Size: Medium, Color: (100) White / White / Mod Gray
This is the first pair of no-show socks I’ve tried that actually don’t slide down into my shoes. Trust me… I have tried lots of different pairs and this is the one! They fit perfectly. They’re not too thick and they’re obviously durable because I wash them after each wear, so daily.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 21, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Great fit but expensive
Size: Medium, Color: (252) Blush Beige / White / Castlerock
These are really great socks. I love them, but they are definitely pricey.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2026