SKU: 4698990753

NGK Spark Plug for VW, Audi & Porsche - ILZKR7A

Sale price$139.05 Regular price$154.50
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $38.62 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 25 - Jul 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

NGK Spark Plug for VW, Audi & Porsche - ILZKR7AVehicle Fitment & Part Details This NGK spark plug (ILZKR7A) is supplied as an OEM grade replacement. Heat range 7. Thread M12 x 1,25. Verify VIN engine before ordering. Key Details SKU ILZKR7A Component Spark Plug Brand NGK Heat Range 7 Part MPN 1961 GTIN Barcode 087295119617 Trade Numbers ILZKR7A Product Specifications Thread Size M12 x 1,25 Thread Length [mm] 26,5 Spanner Size 16 mm Spark Position [mm] 6,5 Electrode Construction Iridium Middle

Vehicle Fitment & Part Details

This NGK spark plug (ILZKR7A) is supplied as an OEM-grade replacement. Heat range 7. Thread M12 x 1,25. Verify VIN/engine before ordering.

Key Details

SKU
ILZKR7A
Component
Spark Plug
Brand
NGK
Heat Range
7
Part MPN
1961
GTIN / Barcode
087295119617
Trade Numbers
ILZKR7A

Product Specifications

Thread Size
M12 x 1,25
Thread Length [mm]
26,5
Spanner Size
16 mm
Spark Position [mm]
6,5
Electrode / Construction
Iridium Middle Electrode, 1 - Earthed Electrode, Interference Suppression 1 kOhm, with gasket seat, Fixed SAE connector
Brand Class
Premium

Vehicle Compatibility

Common fitments include Audi (Q7); Porsche (CAYENNE); VW (ATLAS, EOS, PASSAT, PHAETON, TOUAREG). Always confirm the correct heat range and electrode design for your specific engine variant by VIN before ordering.

OEM Reference Numbers

Vehicle OE Numbers

  • Audi: 101 905 622
  • Bentley: 101 905 622
  • Porsche: 95 517 022 090
  • VW: 101905622

Aftermarket Equivalents

Aftermarket Equivalents (Bosch)

  • 0 242 140 528, YR 6 TII 330 T
Alternate OEM Search References: 95517022090, 0242140528, YR6TII330T

Fitment Notes

  • Always match heat range, thread size and electrode design before ordering. Verify VIN/engine.

Important: Spark plugs are not returnable, exchangeable, or refundable once fitted. Confirm you are ordering the correct part for your vehicle. Compare the new spark plug to the removed plug for thread reach, thread diameter, hex size, electrode style, gap specification, and heat range before fitting. Mismatched spark plugs can cause misfires, pre-ignition, detonation, fouling, or engine damage.

Returns Notice: Once a spark plug has been fitted or threaded into a cylinder head, it cannot be returned, exchanged, or refunded under any circumstances.

Installation / Use / Maintenance Tips

  • Allow the engine to cool fully before removal - cylinder heads are easily damaged when warm.
  • Use the correct deep-socket plug spanner (16 mm) and avoid impact tools.
  • Inspect the existing plug for fouling, oil contamination, or worn electrodes - may indicate engine condition issues.
  • Verify the gap if your supplied plug is not factory-set; consult your service manual for the correct value.
  • Apply a small amount of anti-seize to the threads (sparingly) and torque to manufacturer specification.

Common Questions

Will this NGK spark plug fit my VW?
This part (ILZKR7A) is listed for the applications shown on this page. Always confirm the correct heat range, thread size and electrode design against your vehicle's service manual or a parts lookup before ordering. Verify VIN/engine.

What does the NGK part code mean?
The NGK trade number encodes physical and performance characteristics - thread/reach, electrode design, heat rating, and projection. Each digit and letter has meaning in NGK's naming convention. The heat range is usually the standalone digit (e.g. BPR6ES is heat range 6).

What is the difference between this NGK plug and a Bosch / Champion / Denso equivalent?
The cross-references listed under OEM Reference Numbers are functionally equivalent for the same applications, but materials, electrode design and heat dissipation can differ slightly. NGK is OEM-supply quality and most manufacturers specify NGK or Denso as their factory plug.

How do I confirm fitment if my engine variant isn't listed?
Match the supplied thread size, reach, electrode design and heat range against your existing plug. If unsure, request fitment assistance before ordering.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 4698990753

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 17 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Boise, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
J
Jason Galbraith
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same. The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to. "Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
A
Amy Sullivan
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Provocative and fascinating read
Format: Paperback
Justin Driver's excellent book makes the case that conservatives may come to regret the Supreme Court's 2023 decision striking down affirmative action in college admissions. He argues that, rather than simply check a box to indicate their race, the decision will force non-white applicants to "perform their trauma" in application essays in ways that conservatives may find even more corrosive. And affluent non-white candidates--the people conservatives say should not be benefiting from affirmative action--will be the ones best-positioned to take advantage of the opportunity, since they are most equipped to exploit the loopholes and work-arounds that the Roberts decision created. A truly provocative read.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025

recommand products