SKU: 92807144475

Hays Street 450 Clutch Kit - Ford - 91-2008

Sale price$327.58 Regular price$363.98
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $91.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Hays Street 450 Clutch Kit - Ford - 91-2008Overview: The Street 450 single disc kit is an excellent upgrade from your stock clutch and designed handle mildly modified engines up to 450 horsepower. It is a great clutch where drivability is the most important factor. Our clutch features 30% greater clamping force than a stock clutch allowing you to put more power to the ground and top quality disc material allows for smooth, no chatter engagement. Each kit includes pressure plate, clutch disc,

Overview:

The Street 450 single disc kit is an excellent upgrade from your stock clutch and designed handle mildly modified engines up to 450 horsepower. It is a great clutch where drivability is the most important factor. Our clutch features 30% greater clamping force than a stock clutch allowing you to put more power to the ground and top quality disc material allows for smooth, no-chatter engagement. Each kit includes pressure plate, clutch disc, throwout bearing, alignment tool, and instructions.

Features:

  • Great drivability for power levels up to 450 horsepower
  • Smooth, chatter-free operation using top quality organic composite friction surface material
  • Upgraded damper springs gives up to 30% more clamping pressure than stock OE clutch
  • Clutch disc features heavy duty hub assembly for increased load capacity
  • All Street 450 clutch kits come complete with pressure plate, disc, release bearing, and alignment tool unless otherwise noted

Application:

Year Make Model Submodel Engine Size
1965 - 1971 Ford LTD Base 390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1972 Ford P-350 Base 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford Thunderbird Base 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford LTD Base 427/7.0L V8
1965 - 1970 Ford LTD Base 428/7.0L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford LTD Brougham 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1967 Ford Thunderbird Base 427/7.0L V8
1966 - 1967 Ford Thunderbird Base 428/7.0L V8
1968 - 1972 Ford Thunderbird Base 429/7.0L V8
1968 - 1972 Ford F-250 Base 390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1972 Ford F-350 Base 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford Country Sedan Base 427/7.0L V8
1965 - 1971 Ford Country Sedan Base 390/6.4L V8
1966 - 1971 Ford Country Squire Base 390/6.4L V8
1966 - 1971 Ford Custom 500 Base 390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1972 Ford F-100 Base 390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1970 Ford Mustang Base 428/7.0L V8
1967 - 1969 Ford Mustang Base 390/6.4L V8
1969 - 1972 Ford Custom 500 Base 429/7.0L V8
1969 - 1972 Ford LTD Base 429/7.0L V8
1972 Ford LTD Base 460/7.5L V8
1966 - 1969 Ford Country Squire Base 428/7.0L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford Mustang Mach 1 429/7.0L V8
1965 - 1971 Ford Ranch Wagon Base 390/6.4L V8
1966 - 1970 Ford Ranch Wagon Base 428/7.0L V8
1969 - 1971 Ford Mustang Base 429/7.0L V8
1970 Ford Mustang Grande 428/7.0L V8
1967 - 1969 Ford Ranchero Base 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford Ranch Wagon Base 427/7.0L V8
1970 - 1972 Ford LTD Brougham 429/7.0L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford Ranchero Base 429/7.0L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Torino GT 428/7.0L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford Torino Cobra 429/7.0L V8
1968 - 1970 Ford Torino Base 428/7.0L V8
1969 Ford Torino Squire 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1971 Ford Custom Base 390/6.4L V8
1966 - 1970 Ford Custom Base 428/7.0L V8
1970 - 1972 Ford Ranchero GT 429/7.0L V8
1971 Ford Torino 500 429/7.0L V8
1970 - 1972 Ford Ranchero 500 429/7.0L V8
1967 - 1970 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-500 428/7.0L V8
1968 Ford Torino GT 427/7.0L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford Torino Brougham 429/7.0L V8
1970 - 1972 Ford Ranchero Squire 429/7.0L V8
1969 - 1970 Ford Mustang Boss 429 429/7.0L V8
1969 - 1972 Ford Custom Base 429/7.0L V8
1968 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-500KR 428/7.0L V8
1966 - 1969 Ford GT40 MK III 427/7.0L V8
1969 - 1972 Ford Country Sedan Base 429/7.0L V8
1972 Ford Country Squire Base 460/7.5L V8
1965 - 1969 Ford Fairlane Base 427/7.0L V8
1966 - 1970 Ford Custom 500 Base 428/7.0L V8
1972 Ford LTD Brougham 460/7.5L V8
1970 Ford Falcon Base 429/7.0L V8
1965 - 1967 Ford Galaxie Base 427/7.0L V8
1972 Ford Galaxie 500 Base 460/7.5L V8
1972 Ford Gran Torino Base 429/7.0L V8
1969 - 1972 Ford Galaxie 500 Base 429/7.0L V8
1965 - 1971 Ford Galaxie 500 Base 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford GT40 Base 427/7.0L V8
1966 - 1970 Ford Country Sedan Base 428/7.0L V8
1966 - 1968 Ford Country Squire Base 427/7.0L V8
1969 - 1972 Ford Country Squire Base 429/7.0L V8
1972 Ford Country Sedan Base 460/7.5L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford Custom Base 427/7.0L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford Torino Super Cobra Jet 429/7.0L V8
1967 Ford Ranchero 500 XL 390/6.4L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford Torino Squire 429/7.0L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Ranchero GT 390/6.4L V8
1969 - 1972 Ford Ranch Wagon Base 429/7.0L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford Mustang Grande 429/7.0L V8
1970 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428/7.0L V8
1965 - 1967 Ford Galaxie Base 390/6.4L V8
1966 - 1967 Ford Galaxie Base 428/7.0L V8
1965 - 1969 Ford Fairlane 500 427/7.0L V8
1970 Ford Falcon Futura 429/7.0L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Fairlane Base 428/7.0L V8
1965 - 1970 Ford Fairlane 500 390/6.4L V8
1968 Ford Mustang Base 427/7.0L V8
1972 Ford Custom Base 460/7.5L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford Galaxie 500 Base 427/7.0L V8
1968 - 1970 Ford Galaxie 500 XL 428/7.0L V8
1968 - 1970 Ford Fairlane 500 428/7.0L V8
1970 - 1971 Ford Torino GT 429/7.0L V8
1965 - 1970 Ford Galaxie 500 XL 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1969 Ford Fairlane Base 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford Galaxie 500 XL 427/7.0L V8
1972 Ford M-400 Base 390/6.4L V8
1969 - 1970 Ford Galaxie 500 XL 429/7.0L V8
1972 Ford Gran Torino Sport 429/7.0L V8
1972 Ford Thunderbird Base 460/7.5L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Ranchero Base 428/7.0L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Ranchero GT 428/7.0L V8
1969 Ford Torino Cobra 428/7.0L V8
1970 - 1972 Ford Torino Base 429/7.0L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Ranchero 500 428/7.0L V8
1970 Ford Ranch Wagon Police Cruiser 390/6.4L V8
1965 - 1968 Ford Custom 500 Base 427/7.0L V8
1968 - 1970 Ford Galaxie 500 Base 428/7.0L V8
1972 Ford Gran Torino Squire 429/7.0L V8
1970 Ford Ranch Wagon Police Cruiser 429/7.0L V8
1970 Ford Fairlane 500 429/7.0L V8
1970 Ford Ranch Wagon Police Cruiser 428/7.0L V8
1968 - 1969 Ford Torino GT 390/6.4L V8
1968 - 1970 Ford Torino Base 390/6.4L V8
1967 - 1969 Ford Ranchero 500 390/6.4L V8
1968 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-500 427/7.0L V8
1968 Ford Torino Base 427/7.0L V8
1969 Ford Ranchero 500 /
1966 Ford Fairlane 500XL 427/7.0L V8
1966 Ford Fairlane 500XL 390/6.4L V8

Specs:

Alignment Tool Included Yes
Application Ford
Brand Hays
Disc Diameter 11
Disc Material Organic
Disc Style Spring Hub
Emission Code 5
Input Shaft Diameter 1-3/8 in.
Input Spline 10
Max Horsepower Rating 450
Pilot Bushing Included No
Pressure Plate Style Long
Product Type Clutch Kits
Throwout Bearing Included Yes
Warranty Limited 90 Day Warranty
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 92807144475

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jamie N.Campbell
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
A fresh historical perspective to the Resurrection! -by Jamie D.
Format: Paperback
Although there have been countless books written about the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from a theological perspective, few have successfully tackled the Resurrection from the historical perspective. Dr. Licona has successfully done just that, applying a historical methodology to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. In his opening chapter, Dr. Licona begins by defining what is meant by history, the methods that one employs to study history as well as the limitations that comes when one studies history. It is here that he introduces useful terms to the readers that are re-introduce in subsequent chapter. Horizon, a synonym for bias, can play a critical role in how one perceives and presents history to others. To reduce horizon, Dr. Licona believes that there are six main principles that can help an historian maintain a more objective perspective when reporting history. One of these main principles is that of “historical bedrock” a consensus of what is majorly accepted and infrequently debated. Not only is a consensus important when one considers a hypothesis but a hypothesis that has a solid explanation is important as well. For a hypothesis to have the weight of believability, it must stand up to five different criteria as well. In chapter 2, Dr. Licona then turns his attention to the subject of miracles and their role in history and successfully debunks the most common presuppositions cited by the world’s most famous skeptics against the historicity of miracles. It is in chapter 3 that Dr. Licona employs the historical method to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ by examining both biblical and extrabiblical writings spanning within 200 years of the event. Upon the review of these various writings, he assigns a rating from “unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probably, indeterminate and not useful” to determine if they contain any historical weight in its regard to the independent testimony of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. The historical bedrock principle is re-introduced into chapter 4 and is applied not only to the death of Jesus Christ but to His life as well. Dr. Licona notes that there many aspects of the Jesus’ life and death that are considered historical bedrock even among those with varied agendas. Dr. Licona concludes his book by examining some of the leading naturalistic hypotheses touted from the most prominent liberal and skeptics in this field. By employing the five criteria that gives the historian the most successful explanation, Licona concludes that it is not the naturalistic hypothesis which fits regarding the Resurrection, but the supernatural one. The supernatural hypothesis of the Resurrection is the most solid explanation since it fulfills both historical bedrock as well as meeting all five criteria for the best explanation and thus should be considered by any credible historian as a well attested event that occurred in the past. In summary, I highly recommend this book. As a believer of 40+ years, I learned things about my faith that I did not know about before. For example, I learned how the kerygma, an early Christian creed, lends historical weight to the Resurrection. My advice for believers is not to be intimidated by the voluminous size of this book. It was certainly well worth the read. Dr. Licona has done an excellent job in presenting the material through the perspective of a historian, so much so that one may temporarily forget that he is a theologian as well! Despite the myriad of footnotes peppered through the pages, the book was very easy to read and digest. In short, a must read for those who want to have a better understanding in how to engage skeptics from a different perspective when discussing the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Get it! You’ll feel that much smarter and grounded in the faith once you’ve read the last page!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2021
J
Verified Purchase
John Keller
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Don’t be intimidated...it's detailed, but systematic and rational
Format: Paperback
Don’t be intimidated by this 700-page tome. Once you factor in the bibliography, index and footnotes, the body of the work is only about 400 pages. Licona includes an all-important, detailed outline for quick reference back to key topics, and it’s valuable because of the variety of issues he tackles. I’d say, he does a wonderful job of giving us an objective, systematic approach to addressing the historicity of the events following Jesus’ crucifixion. Licona lays the groundwork for his examination of the issue by considering the philosophy of history and tackling things like what is truth, what makes something a historical fact, who has the burden of proof, and is history a science? As a needed addition to this philosophical introduction, he spends time outlining the methods he will use to approaching relevant texts, claims of miracles, and consensus facts. Most important, I think, to his methods was his self-examination of potential bias due to personal belief and worldview. He addresses what he calls a personal “horizon” that historians must be set aside in order to be objective and get at the truth. He certainly points it out in others along the way and makes it clear throughout the book that he is trying to identify and eliminate any potential bias he may bring to the process. In his investigation, he addresses the most important sources related to Jesus’ life, crucifixion and claims of the resurrection. He deals with both Christian and non-Christian sources that were written immediately following the events as well as within the following 200 years. Licona makes the case for authenticity and credibility of the most important sources, and where there have been challenges to these sources over the centuries, he addresses those challenges head on. Ultimately, he boils the events, claims, facts and sources down to what he calls the “bedrock” pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This bedrock consists of three facts that are well supported by authentic, textual evidence which enjoy nearly consensus support by all historians (both Christian and non-Christian). For Licona, the bedrock which need be answered are (1) Jesus’ death by crucifixion, (2) the claims Jesus appeared to individuals and groups following his burial, and (3) the conversion of the Church persecutor, Paul. Ultimately, Licona breaks down six different hypotheses which claim to explain the bedrock and he uses systematic criteria for weighing those hypotheses. He concludes that a resurrection is the best explanation but admits that it’s only by setting aside a naturalistic worldview that one can embrace the conclusion. I like Licona’s methodical approach but would offer two critiques. Do we really need all the Greek citations written out? I understand that there is nuance and variations in meaning for words that are used in the original sources, but to give us all the text and the translation seemed superfluous. Second, I think it was a cop-out to skim the importance of the empty tomb. Other historians put the fact of the empty tomb as one of their top facts to be explained, but Licona punted on it because he didn’t feel it received universal consensus. Consensus aside, the fact of the empty tomb does receive support by a strong majority of scholars, even ones that do not support the resurrection. This cross-section of scholarly support, along with the volume and type of textural evidence, namely the confirmation by Christian enemies, should have elevated the fact of the empty tomb to the “bedrock” which require explanation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2021
E
Verified Purchase
Elly
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
so helpful
Format: Paperback
got for school and used it a lot its been so helpful
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2026
E
Verified Purchase
E
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Great price...
Format: Paperback
Needed this for my EKG course. Price was right.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2026
L
Verified Purchase
LUCIOUS
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Satisfied
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
Brand new got here on time, haven’t got to indulge in the content yet but definitely exactly what I ordered.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2025

recommand products