Pay in installments of $6.22 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
wasserburg am inn uitzicht op inn otto geigenbergerWasserburg am Inn, uitzicht op de Inn: een schilderij doordrenkt met sereniteit De kunstdruk van Wasserburg am Inn, uitzicht op de Inn, brengt ons naar het hart van een idyllisch landschap, waar de rivier de Inn zachtjes kronkelt tussen de groene oevers. De zachte pastelkleuren, met tinten van blauw, groen en beige, creren een rustgevende en dromerige sfeer. De olieverftechniek van Otto Geigenberger maakt het mogelijk om het natuurlijke licht vast te
Wasserburg am Inn, uitzicht op de Inn: een schilderij doordrenkt met sereniteit De kunstdruk van Wasserburg am Inn, uitzicht op de Inn, brengt ons naar het hart van een idyllisch landschap, waar de rivier de Inn zachtjes kronkelt tussen de groene oevers. De zachte pastelkleuren, met tinten van blauw, groen en beige, creëren een rustgevende en dromerige sfeer. De olieverftechniek van Otto Geigenberger maakt het mogelijk om het natuurlijke licht vast te leggen, waardoor het water fonkelt en de historische gebouwen langs de rivier verlicht worden. Elk detail, van de weerspiegelingen in het water tot de drijvende wolken in de lucht, nodigt uit tot contemplatie en ontsnapping. Otto Geigenberger: een meester van het Beierse landschap Otto Geigenberger, actief in het begin van de 20e eeuw, wordt erkend om zijn idyllische landschappen die de schoonheid van de Duitse natuur vieren. Geïnspireerd door de impressionistische beweging, richtte hij zich op het weergeven van licht en sfeer van zijn onderwerpen, vaak in openlucht. Zijn werken, hoewel minder bekend dan die van zijn tijdgenoten, getuigen van een unieke gevoeligheid voor de schoonheid van het Beierse landschap. Geigenberger wist de essentie van zijn regio vast te leggen, waardoor elk schilderij een open raam wordt naar een vredig en harmonieus wereldje, waar natuur en architectuur samenkomen. Een decoratieve aanwinst met vele voordelen De kunstdruk van Wasserburg am Inn, uitzicht op de Inn, vormt een ideale decoratieve keuze voor diverse ruimtes zoals de woonkamer, kantoor of slaapkamer. Het palet van rustgevende kleuren en de rustige sfeer brengen een vleugje sereniteit in uw interieur. De kwaliteit van de afdruk garandeert een opmerkelijke fideliteit aan de details van het originele werk, terwijl het een onmiskenbare esthetische aantrekkingskracht biedt. Door dit schilderij in uw inrichting te integreren, brengt u niet alleen de schoonheid van de natuur in uw ruimte, maar ook een stukje artistieke geschiedenis, waardoor uw dagelijkse omgeving verrijkt wordt.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 16 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
A fresh historical perspective to the Resurrection! -by Jamie D.
Format: Paperback
Although there have been countless books written about the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from a theological perspective, few have successfully tackled the Resurrection from the historical perspective. Dr. Licona has successfully done just that, applying a historical methodology to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
In his opening chapter, Dr. Licona begins by defining what is meant by history, the methods that one employs to study history as well as the limitations that comes when one studies history. It is here that he introduces useful terms to the readers that are re-introduce in subsequent chapter. Horizon, a synonym for bias, can play a critical role in how one perceives and presents history to others. To reduce horizon, Dr. Licona believes that there are six main principles that can help an historian maintain a more objective perspective when reporting history. One of these main principles is that of “historical bedrock” a consensus of what is majorly accepted and infrequently debated. Not only is a consensus important when one considers a hypothesis but a hypothesis that has a solid explanation is important as well. For a hypothesis to have the weight of believability, it must stand up to five different criteria as well.
In chapter 2, Dr. Licona then turns his attention to the subject of miracles and their role in history and successfully debunks the most common presuppositions cited by the world’s most famous skeptics against the historicity of miracles.
It is in chapter 3 that Dr. Licona employs the historical method to the Resurrection of Jesus Christ by examining both biblical and extrabiblical writings spanning within 200 years of the event. Upon the review of these various writings, he assigns a rating from “unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probably, indeterminate and not useful” to determine if they contain any historical weight in its regard to the independent testimony of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.
The historical bedrock principle is re-introduced into chapter 4 and is applied not only to the death of Jesus Christ but to His life as well. Dr. Licona notes that there many aspects of the Jesus’ life and death that are considered historical bedrock even among those with varied agendas.
Dr. Licona concludes his book by examining some of the leading naturalistic hypotheses touted from the most prominent liberal and skeptics in this field. By employing the five criteria that gives the historian the most successful explanation, Licona concludes that it is not the naturalistic hypothesis which fits regarding the Resurrection, but the supernatural one. The supernatural hypothesis of the Resurrection is the most solid explanation since it fulfills both historical bedrock as well as meeting all five criteria for the best explanation and thus should be considered by any credible historian as a well attested event that occurred in the past.
In summary, I highly recommend this book. As a believer of 40+ years, I learned things about my faith that I did not know about before. For example, I learned how the kerygma, an early Christian creed, lends historical weight to the Resurrection. My advice for believers is not to be intimidated by the voluminous size of this book. It was certainly well worth the read. Dr. Licona has done an excellent job in presenting the material through the perspective of a historian, so much so that one may temporarily forget that he is a theologian as well! Despite the myriad of footnotes peppered through the pages, the book was very easy to read and digest. In short, a must read for those who want to have a better understanding in how to engage skeptics from a different perspective when discussing the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Get it! You’ll feel that much smarter and grounded in the faith once you’ve read the last page!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Don’t be intimidated...it's detailed, but systematic and rational
Format: Paperback
Don’t be intimidated by this 700-page tome. Once you factor in the bibliography, index and footnotes, the body of the work is only about 400 pages. Licona includes an all-important, detailed outline for quick reference back to key topics, and it’s valuable because of the variety of issues he tackles. I’d say, he does a wonderful job of giving us an objective, systematic approach to addressing the historicity of the events following Jesus’ crucifixion.
Licona lays the groundwork for his examination of the issue by considering the philosophy of history and tackling things like what is truth, what makes something a historical fact, who has the burden of proof, and is history a science? As a needed addition to this philosophical introduction, he spends time outlining the methods he will use to approaching relevant texts, claims of miracles, and consensus facts. Most important, I think, to his methods was his self-examination of potential bias due to personal belief and worldview. He addresses what he calls a personal “horizon” that historians must be set aside in order to be objective and get at the truth. He certainly points it out in others along the way and makes it clear throughout the book that he is trying to identify and eliminate any potential bias he may bring to the process.
In his investigation, he addresses the most important sources related to Jesus’ life, crucifixion and claims of the resurrection. He deals with both Christian and non-Christian sources that were written immediately following the events as well as within the following 200 years. Licona makes the case for authenticity and credibility of the most important sources, and where there have been challenges to these sources over the centuries, he addresses those challenges head on. Ultimately, he boils the events, claims, facts and sources down to what he calls the “bedrock” pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This bedrock consists of three facts that are well supported by authentic, textual evidence which enjoy nearly consensus support by all historians (both Christian and non-Christian). For Licona, the bedrock which need be answered are (1) Jesus’ death by crucifixion, (2) the claims Jesus appeared to individuals and groups following his burial, and (3) the conversion of the Church persecutor, Paul.
Ultimately, Licona breaks down six different hypotheses which claim to explain the bedrock and he uses systematic criteria for weighing those hypotheses. He concludes that a resurrection is the best explanation but admits that it’s only by setting aside a naturalistic worldview that one can embrace the conclusion.
I like Licona’s methodical approach but would offer two critiques. Do we really need all the Greek citations written out? I understand that there is nuance and variations in meaning for words that are used in the original sources, but to give us all the text and the translation seemed superfluous. Second, I think it was a cop-out to skim the importance of the empty tomb. Other historians put the fact of the empty tomb as one of their top facts to be explained, but Licona punted on it because he didn’t feel it received universal consensus. Consensus aside, the fact of the empty tomb does receive support by a strong majority of scholars, even ones that do not support the resurrection. This cross-section of scholarly support, along with the volume and type of textural evidence, namely the confirmation by Christian enemies, should have elevated the fact of the empty tomb to the “bedrock” which require explanation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2021
★★★★★ 5
so helpful
Format: Paperback
got for school and used it a lot its been so helpful
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great price...
Format: Paperback
Needed this for my EKG course. Price was right.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Satisfied
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
Brand new got here on time, haven’t got to indulge in the content yet but definitely exactly what I ordered.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2025