SKU: 97976820091

Richmond Interiors Gwen Eetkamerstoel

Sale price$307.25 Regular price$341.39
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $85.35 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 24 - Jul 29

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Richmond Interiors Gwen EetkamerstoelOmschrijving De Richmond Interiors Gwen eetkamerstoel is een prachtige stoel met verfijnde uitstraling. Het design van de Gwen is te omschrijven als tijdloos met ronde vormen en een chique onderstel. De zitting en de rugleuning van deze stoel zijn verkrijgbaar in zachte khaki velvet stof of zachte antraciet velvet stof. Het onderstel van deze elegante eetkamerstoel is gemaakt van goudkleurig roestvrij staal en is leidend in het design. Samengevat, de

Omschrijving

De Richmond Interiors Gwen eetkamerstoel is een prachtige stoel met verfijnde uitstraling. Het design van de Gwen is te omschrijven als tijdloos met ronde vormen en een chique onderstel. De zitting en de rugleuning van deze stoel zijn verkrijgbaar in zachte khaki velvet stof of zachte antraciet velvet stof. Het onderstel van deze elegante eetkamerstoel is gemaakt van goudkleurig roestvrij staal en is leidend in het design. Samengevat, de Richmond Interiors Gwen eetkamerstoel is een premium eetkamerstoel en een tijdloze eyecatcher aan de eettafel!

Over het merk

Van Spieghel naar Richmond Interiors. Bijna 45 jaar geleden begon Richmond Interiors onder de naam Spieghel Trading Company met de inkoop en verkoop van antieke meubelen. Voordat ze het wisten vervulden ze de functie van groothandel voor talloze winkels, maar ze wilde meer: zélf ontwerpen en produceren.

Vandaag de dag werkt Richmond samen met betrouwbare leveranciers, de beste vakmensen en de nieuwste machines om voortdurend het beste van het beste te ontwerpen en produceren. Richmond artikelen moeten altijd klasse, comfort en sfeer uitstralen. Ze streven continu naar de perfecte balans tussen duurzame kwaliteit met een chique touch en een passende prijs. Ieder jaar worden de Richmond collecties aangevuld met nieuwe ontwerpen. Tegelijkertijd houden ze de meest populaire klassiekers uit hun geschiedenis in leven voor de liefhebbers.


Specificaties

Afmetingen
Breedte 54 cm
Diepte 57,5 cm
Hoogte 79,5 cm
Breedte zitting 46 cm
Diepte zitting
46 cm
Hoogte zitting 48 cm
Hoogte armleuning 70 cm
Gewicht 9,5 kg
Algemene specificaties
Productnummer Khaki Velvet
S4544 FR KHAKI VELVET
Antraciet Velvet
S4544 FR ANTRACIET VELVET
EAN Khaki Velvet
8720621673330
Antraciet Velvet
8720621673323
Armleuning Ja
Variant
Khaki Velvet
Antraciet Velvet
Kleur
Khaki Velvet
Quartz 903 Khaki
Antraciet Velvet
Quartz 801 Antraciet
Materiaal zitting 100% polyester
Materiaal rugleuning 100% polyester
Materiaal onderstel Roestvrij staal

Verzending & retour

Bij Fauteuilonline betaal je geen verzendkosten. De levertijd van dit product bedraagt 5 tot 10 werkdagen. Het kan echter voorkomen dat dit product even niet op voorraad is. In dat geval zullen we dit tijdig met je communiceren. De retourtermijn bedraagt 14 dagen.

Garantie

De garantieperiode bedraagt 2 jaar.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 97976820091

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 13 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
R
Verified Purchase
Russell P. Hills
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
BEST BOOK IN 20 YEARS
Format: Hardcover
BEST BOOK that I have read in 20 years. This should be required reading in Christian schools. Every Christian who has graduated from high school should read this book. As one who has studied Church History, Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek myself, I had become very disappointed in what passes as scholarship, even among Ivy Leage graduates, in the 21st century. HOWEVER, Dr. Pitre's book is a great encouragement that there really are people "out-there" that display genuine scholarship. With Appreciation, Russ Hills, Ph.D.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
A
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
A Case for Jesus' Divine Self-Conception
Format: Kindle
This is a very meticulously reasoned argument attempting to show that Jesus had a Divine self-conception. That is, Jesus believed, and claimed, that he was God. Pitre begins by posing C.S. Lewis’ famous “trilemma” to the reader. If Jesus claimed to be God, we have three ways to respond – he was either a Liar, Lunatic, or Lord. Pitre’s work in this book strives to bring us back, face to face, with this trilemma. To accomplish this, Pitre needs to defeat another popular notion in the modern mind – that Jesus, or at least much of the Gospel material about him, was a “Legend.” If Pitre can show that Jesus did, in fact, historically claim Divinity, we will be forced to respond to his claim and answer Jesus’ own question for ourselves – “Who do you say that I am?” To accomplish this Pitre first attempts to show that the Gospels are historically reliable. He believes that, contrary to modern scholarly opinion, the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they have been attributed to (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), that they were intended to portray historically accurate biographical pictures of Jesus, and that they were written much more closely to the time of Jesus than liberal scholars assume (Pitre tentatively dates the synoptic Gospels all before the destruction of the Temple in AD 70). These three pieces of evidence – authorship, intent, and dating – all lead Pitre to the conclusion that the Gospels give us historically accurate information about Jesus. After setting the stage by arguing for the accuracy of our sources, Pitre delves into the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and tries to show that although it is not always explicit (i.e. Jesus doesn’t say “I am God, worship Me.”) even the synoptics portray Jesus as claiming Divinity. Using evidence such as Jesus’ use of the titles “Son of Man” and “I Am,” prophesy from the book of Daniel, Jesus’ “stilling of the storm,” the transfiguration, the pronouncement of the forgiveness of the parlytic’s sins, the riddle about the Son of David being David’s “Lord,”, the crucifixion, and the resurrection, Pitre makes his case. In the end, he believes that not only do the Gospel authors portray Jesus as Divine, but that these claims came from Jesus himself. Thus we are led, full circle, back to the trilemma. We can call Jesus Liar, Lunatic, or Lord, but not, according to Pitre, a Legend. This was a really interesting read from a conservative scholar. His exegesis of many Gospel passages illuminate how the Hebrew Scriptures provide a much needed backdrop for understanding each story. The Gospels are much more nuanced than we might first think and oftentimes one saying or image may evoke whole passages or concepts from the Old Testament that would have been apparent to early Jewish readers. As Pitre argues, understanding the Jewish context of the synoptic authors helps in understanding their Christology. In the end, I agree with Pitre that the Gospels are generally more historically accurate than “mainstream” scholars give them credit for. I think it’s plausible that the Gospel titles reveal their true authors and that they were written fairly early after Jesus’ death (before the fall of Jerusalem). I also agree that the Synoptics may implicitly ascribe Divinity to Jesus – although I don’t think that is an open and shut case. If there were more explicit cases in the synoptic Gospels where Jesus claimed Divinity, it would help his case. It still seems to me the only explicit sayings we have come from the Gospel of John, which even Pitre doesn’t seem to argue is historically reliable (at least he doesn’t focus on this in the book). It’s probably outside the scope of this book, but I would have loved to see Pitre address the idea of Jesus as Apocalyptic Prophet. He interacts with several scholars who accept this notion (EP Sanders, Dale Allison, Bart Ehrman, John Meier) and it’s a viable option in the world of Historical Jesus scholarship. I think it’s a relevant topic in all discussions surrounding a Historical Jesus and can be a large factor in how one answers the question of Jesus’ identity. This study is worth reading regardless of your theological persuasion, and Pitre’s arguments deserve serious consideration.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2016
S
Verified Purchase
ShopWeez
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Relief for dry mouth without gum irritation
Big improvement for users with sensitive gums. These relieve dry mouth during the night almost as well as the regular tabs. Some complained about a residual gel left on the gums. 🙄Just wipe it off. It’s a small thing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 4, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Bronx Mike
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
An easy fix for dry mouth
Excellent for dry mouth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Discerning Buyer
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 1
This version doesn’t work
I used these 2 nights in a row. I was hoping Oracoat found a solution to the problem people like me have with the regular Xylimelts: irritation of gums. As others have noted the “sensitive” version doesn’t melt and the goo that remains can be difficult to remove. I didn’t have too much trouble after the first night. However, the second day after use, it was so hard to get the remains out, I wound up with a very sore spot from digging it out. I will toss the rest. It’s too bad this effort fizzled. I hope Oracoat will find a solution For sensitive mouths. In the b meantime, I will use the original for a few nights and then stop before repeating. The idea behind the original product is fantastic. Unfortunately this attempt to make it usable for people with sensitive mouths hasn’t worked. Please try again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2025

recommand products