Pay in installments of $7.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 28 - Aug 2
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
PUMA JR CITY 25-26 AWAY SHORT BLACKDeze voetbalshort is vergelijkbaar met de shorts die de spelers droegen tijdens het seizoen 25 26. Ze zijn gemaakt van lichte, ademende stoffen en bieden maximaal comfort en mobiliteit op het veld. Ze zijn ontworpen om de uitrusting van je idolen te evenaren en combineren functionaliteit met stijl, met als resultaat de perfecte pasvorm voor actie op de wedstrijddag. dryCELL: zeer functionele materialen voeren het zweet af van je huid, zodat je lichaam
Deze voetbalshort is vergelijkbaar met de shorts die de spelers droegen tijdens het seizoen-25/26. Ze zijn gemaakt van lichte, ademende stoffen en bieden maximaal comfort en mobiliteit op het veld. Ze zijn ontworpen om de uitrusting van je idolen te evenaren en combineren functionaliteit met stijl, met als resultaat de perfecte pasvorm voor actie op de wedstrijddag.
- dryCELL: zeer functionele materialen voeren het zweet af van je huid, zodat je lichaam droog en comfortabel blijft tijdens het sporten
- Gemaakt van 100% gerecycled materiaal, exclusief afwerking en decoraties
- Pasvorm: Normaal
- Hoofdmateriaal 2: Dubbelzijdig jacquard
- Lengte: Lengte tot boven de knie
- Taille: Gemiddeld
- Gedragen door de spelers tijdens het seizoen 25/26
- Branding van de club en van PUMA
- PUMA voor jongeren: aanbevolen voor oudere kinderen tussen 8 en 16 jaar
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 6 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Durable and cost effective
Size: 100 Pack
Great value for your money. These are sturdy aluminum pans. Also great for cooking-baking in the oven.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 23, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Exactly what I needed
Size: 100 Pack
These are great for making cleanup from cooking easier. Like most disposable pans, these are a little on the flimsy side when loaded with food, but I either put them on a cookie sheet or inside another baking pan for loading into and out of the oven, and they work great that way.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2020
★★★★★ 1
Horrible quality. Manufacturer has created absolute junk.
Size: 100 Pack
I have bought these pans many times and I’ve been very happy with them. However, the most recent batch I got of 100 was shockingly inferior to what I received before they are of such poor quality that they bend like a piece of aluminum foil. they are dangerous to cook with if you pick them up. They just bend. Usually, they are packed in a carton which then is inside the Amazon box. This time, they were just in the Amazon carton and then arrived crumpled and crushed. Wherever they bought them from is a disgrace. I will never buy them again. They are a disaster and dangerous to use in your oven.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
SORRY WRONG SIZE ORDERED
Size: 100 Pack
THE ITEM APPEARED TO BE FINE BUT WERE JUST TOO SMALL FOR WHAT WE NEEDED. SORRY THAT I HAD TO RETURN THEM,
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 16, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Good stuff
Size: 100 Pack
Excellent materials. As advertised-no surprises with finding stamped foil that doesn’t hold its contents. My wife uses these to bring food to my work and she is perceived as a professional chef.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2021