SKU: 89258236967

Cometic Chevy Small Block 4.060 inch Bore .084 inch MLS-5 Head Gasket (18 or 23 Deg. Heads)

Sale price$139.23 Regular price$154.70
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $38.67 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 5 - Aug 10

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Cometic Chevy Small Block 4.060 inch Bore .084 inch MLS-5 Head Gasket (18 or 23 Deg. Heads)Comprised of multiple embossed layers of stainless steel with the outer layers utilizing a Viton rubber coating. Compressed operating thickness is 0. 084". Round Bore. Cometic MLS (Multi Layer Steel) Head Gaskets provide maximum sealing performance for todays high output engines and require no sealants. MLS gaskets are ideal for both aluminum heads to aluminum blocks and aluminum heads to cast iron blocks. They can withstand the shearing force created

Comprised of multiple embossed layers of stainless steel with the outer layers utilizing a Viton rubber coating. Compressed operating thickness is 0.084". Round Bore. Cometic MLS (Multi-Layer Steel) Head Gaskets provide maximum sealing performance for todays high output engines and require no sealants. MLS gaskets are ideal for both aluminum heads to aluminum blocks and aluminum heads to cast iron blocks. They can withstand the shearing force created by the two materials. MLS gaskets have increased strength because they are comprised of multiple layers of stainless steel; which also creates the ability to rebound and resist corrosion. The outer layers are embossed and coated on both sides with Viton (a flour elastomer rubber based material that is heat resistant to 250 C/ 482 F). Viton is designed to meet the demands of a variety of harsh sealing environments, load conditions, and surface finishes. The center or shim layer is uncoated stainless steel, which can be varied to accommodate multiple thickness requirements.

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1980-1985 Avanti II Base
1985 Avanti II GT
1980-1981 Buick Century Base
1980-1981 Buick Century Estate
1980-1981 Buick Century Limited
1980-1981 Buick Century Sport
1982 Buick LeSabre Custom
1982 Buick LeSabre Limited
1982 Buick LeSabre Limited Edition F/E
1980-1981,1986 Buick Regal Base
1980-1981,1986 Buick Regal Limited
1980-1982 Checker Marathon Base
1980-1982 Checker Marathon Deluxe
1980 Chevrolet C10 Big Ten
1980-1981 Chevrolet C10 Cheyenne
1981-1986 Chevrolet C10 Custom
1980 Chevrolet C10 Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet C10 Deluxe
1980-1986 Chevrolet C10 Scottsdale
1980-1986 Chevrolet C10 Silverado
1981-1986 Chevrolet C10 Suburban Custom
1980 Chevrolet C10 Suburban Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet C10 Suburban Deluxe
1980,1982,1984-1986 Chevrolet C10 Suburban Scottsdale
1980,1982-1986 Chevrolet C10 Suburban Silverado
1980-1981 Chevrolet C20 Cheyenne
1981-1986 Chevrolet C20 Custom
1980 Chevrolet C20 Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet C20 Deluxe
1980-1986 Chevrolet C20 Scottsdale
1980-1986 Chevrolet C20 Silverado
1981-1986 Chevrolet C20 Suburban Custom
1980 Chevrolet C20 Suburban Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet C20 Suburban Deluxe
1980,1982,1984-1986 Chevrolet C20 Suburban Scottsdale
1980,1982-1986 Chevrolet C20 Suburban Silverado
1980-1981 Chevrolet C30 Cheyenne
1981-1986 Chevrolet C30 Custom
1980 Chevrolet C30 Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet C30 Deluxe
1980-1986 Chevrolet C30 Scottsdale
1980-1986 Chevrolet C30 Silverado
1980 Chevrolet Camaro Base
1980-1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
1985-1986 Chevrolet Camaro Iroc-Z
1980 Chevrolet Camaro Rally Sport
1981-1986 Chevrolet Camaro Sport
1980-1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
1982 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Indianapolis 500 Pace Car
1986 Chevrolet Caprice Base
1980-1986 Chevrolet Caprice Classic
1986 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Brougham
1981-1982 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Estate
1980-1981 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Landau
1980 Chevrolet Caprice Classic Sport
1980-1982,1984-1986 Chevrolet Corvette Base
1982 Chevrolet Corvette Collector's Edition
1986 Chevrolet Corvette Indianapolis 500 Pace Car
1980-1986 Chevrolet El Camino Base
1981-1986 Chevrolet El Camino Conquista
1980-1981 Chevrolet El Camino Royal Knight
1980-1986 Chevrolet El Camino SS
1983 Chevrolet G10 Base
1980-1986 Chevrolet G10 Beauville
1981-1984,1986 Chevrolet G10 Bonaventure
1980-1986 Chevrolet G10 Chevy Van
1980-1986 Chevrolet G10 Sportvan
1980-1986 Chevrolet G20 Beauville
1983-1984 Chevrolet G20 Bonaventure
1980-1986 Chevrolet G20 Chevy Van
1980-1981 Chevrolet G20 Nomad
1980-1986 Chevrolet G20 Sportvan
1980-1986 Chevrolet G30 Beauville
1983-1984 Chevrolet G30 Bonaventure
1980-1986 Chevrolet G30 Chevy Van
1980-1986 Chevrolet G30 Hi-Cube
1980-1986 Chevrolet G30 Sportvan
1980-1985 Chevrolet Impala Base
1981-1982 Chevrolet Impala Estate
1980 Chevrolet Impala Sport
1980-1981 Chevrolet K10 Cheyenne
1981-1986 Chevrolet K10 Custom
1980 Chevrolet K10 Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet K10 Deluxe
1980-1986 Chevrolet K10 Scottsdale
1980-1986 Chevrolet K10 Silverado
1981-1986 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Custom
1980 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Deluxe
1980,1982,1984-1986 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Scottsdale
1980,1982-1983,1985-1986 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Silverado
1980-1981 Chevrolet K20 Cheyenne
1981-1986 Chevrolet K20 Custom
1980 Chevrolet K20 Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet K20 Deluxe
1980-1986 Chevrolet K20 Scottsdale
1980-1983,1985-1986 Chevrolet K20 Silverado
1981-1986 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Custom
1980 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Deluxe
1980,1982,1984-1986 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Scottsdale
1980,1982-1983,1985-1986 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Silverado
1980-1981 Chevrolet K30 Cheyenne
1981-1986 Chevrolet K30 Custom
1980 Chevrolet K30 Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet K30 Deluxe
1980-1986 Chevrolet K30 Scottsdale
1980-1986 Chevrolet K30 Silverado
1980 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Cheyenne
1981-1986 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Custom
1980 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Custom Deluxe
1981 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Deluxe
1984 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Scottsdale
1980-1986 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
1980-1981 Chevrolet Malibu Base
1980-1983 Chevrolet Malibu Classic
1980 Chevrolet Malibu Classic Estate
1980-1981 Chevrolet Malibu Classic Landau
1980 Chevrolet Malibu Classic Sport
1980 Chevrolet Malibu Estate
1980 Chevrolet Malibu Sport
1981-1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Base
1983 Chevrolet Monte Carlo CL
1980-1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Landau
1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Sport
1983-1986 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS
1985 Excalibur Phaeton Anniversary
1983-1984,1986 Excalibur Phaeton Base
1980-1986 GMC C1500 Base
1980 GMC C1500 Heavy Half
1980-1986 GMC C1500 High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC C1500 Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC C1500 Sierra Grande
1980-1982 GMC C1500 Street Coupe
1980-1986 GMC C1500 Suburban Base
1980-1986 GMC C1500 Suburban High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC C1500 Suburban Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC C1500 Suburban Sierra Grande
1980-1986 GMC C2500 Base
1980-1986 GMC C2500 High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC C2500 Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC C2500 Sierra Grande
1980-1986 GMC C2500 Suburban Base
1980-1986 GMC C2500 Suburban High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC C2500 Suburban Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC C2500 Suburban Sierra Grande
1980-1986 GMC C3500 Base
1980-1986 GMC C3500 High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC C3500 Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC C3500 Sierra Grande
1981-1986 GMC Caballero Amarillo
1980-1986 GMC Caballero Base
1981 GMC Caballero Conquista
1980-1986 GMC Caballero Diablo
1980 GMC Caballero Laredo
1981 GMC Caballero Royal Knight
1980-1986 GMC G1500 Rally
1983-1984 GMC G1500 Rally Custom
1980-1986 GMC G1500 Rally STX
1980-1986 GMC G1500 Vandura
1980-1986 GMC G2500 Rally
1983-1984 GMC G2500 Rally Custom
1980-1986 GMC G2500 Rally STX
1980-1986 GMC G2500 Vandura
1980-1986 GMC G3500 Magnavan
1980-1986 GMC G3500 Rally
1980-1986 GMC G3500 Rally Camper Special
1981-1986 GMC G3500 Rally Custom
1980-1986 GMC G3500 Rally STX
1980-1986 GMC G3500 Vandura
1980-1986 GMC G3500 Vandura Special
1980-1986 GMC Jimmy Base
1980-1985 GMC Jimmy High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC Jimmy Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC Jimmy Sierra Grande
1980-1982 GMC Jimmy Street Coupe
1980-1986 GMC K1500 Base
1980-1986 GMC K1500 High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC K1500 Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC K1500 Sierra Grande
1980-1986 GMC K1500 Suburban Base
1980-1986 GMC K1500 Suburban High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC K1500 Suburban Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC K1500 Suburban Sierra Grande
1980-1986 GMC K2500 Base
1980-1986 GMC K2500 High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC K2500 Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC K2500 Sierra Grande
1980-1986 GMC K2500 Suburban Base
1980-1986 GMC K2500 Suburban High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC K2500 Suburban Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC K2500 Suburban Sierra Grande
1980-1986 GMC K3500 Base
1980-1986 GMC K3500 High Sierra
1980-1986 GMC K3500 Sierra Classic
1980-1982 GMC K3500 Sierra Grande
1980-1985 GMC P3500 Value Van
1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass Base
1980-1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Brougham
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 89258236967

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 14 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
D
Verified Purchase
D. Jenkins
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 4
Very good, low budget blower.
For the price, this blower is very good. I had a WORX blower and mulcher, previously, that worked well, but this blower does the one thing better. I do miss the mulcher, but not the extra weight. This stand-alone blower is about 3 pounds lighter and more powerful; though, the all-in-one had more precise airflow, for the few small spots that it was beneficial for me. The build quality is so-so on this blower. It lacks what we all appreciate in our tools and devices—that sharp snap and click and clean fit when putting the pieces together. The hose attaches to the body with an imperfect and never fully flush connection. It's not going to go anywhere—it does have a latch. The pieces are not as rugged and solid as my previous WORX all-in-one, but I can guess that's what helps reduce the weight. Speaking of, I had considered the WORX WG547, cordless blower, for the weight reduction and convenience of no cord, but I was concerned with loss of power, limited usage time, and higher cost. After using this WG520 for the first time, I do desire a lighter machine, but I think I would miss the extra power and limitless usage time. If budget was not an issue, I probably would've gone with the WG546—which is a step up from the cordless WG547 I was considering—with an extra battery; but that is 3-4 times the cost of this WG520. But even that blower could not match the power of this one. It's worth noting that that power comes from a large air intake on the back that can suck in loose clothing. Cost was the number one priority for me; so I was pleasantly surprised when I found that on this low-budget machine there are variable speeds, ranging between the low to high speeds. If cost is the number one priority for you as well, without having to lose too much power capability, I can easily recommend this WG520 WORX blower.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 22, 2023
D
Verified Purchase
D. Alexander
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Buy this one, forget the rest
This is one of the most powerful handheld electric blowers available. If you're serious about getting the job done quickly, this is the baseline. The next power tier is a gas backpack blower at five times the cost, then an even more powerful backpack, and then four-digit specialty tools from companies like Billy Goat. I bought the Worx because I didn't want to spend three hours raking a half-acre of grass. My trial run was an hour of continuous use with matted wet leaves and driveway sand. It fast became apparent that to be efficient, a blower has to move leaves without being on top of them. Blowing from six inches just makes everything scatter as piles build up. You end up crisscrossing the section you just cleared to deal with the strays. The further your breeze carries, the more direct the flight path of the leaves. This range, and the ability to scour stubborn leaves from the ground, comes from air speed (MPH). At the same time, though, you need a big enough wall of air to move more than one leaf at once. That comes from the size of your pipe opening. The two multiplied together determine your total air volume over a duration, or CFM (cubic feet per minute). In physics-land (with spherical cows and turbulence-free pipes, spared from the icy hand of marketing), CFM is the best measure of a blower's work capacity. MPH, you can change by varying the size of the pipe; a smaller pipe makes a smaller column of air moving at a faster speed (and more impressive advertising), which is why a lot of consumer-class blowers have tiny nozzles. (I'm looking at you, Sun Joe SBJ601E.) But there's a cost to adding MPH: it kills efficiency. The energy to move a volume of air goes up with the square of speed, so if you design your blower for 160 MPH, you'll get half the CFM of a 110 MPH blower from the same power. Something to mull if the blower is powered by a battery. Still, if you know either speed or CFM, and the size of the pipe, you can calculate the other (assuming the manufacturer isn't misleading you by quoting CFM at the fan and MPH at the end of the pipe). To get CFM from MPH and the radius of a round pipe, the calculation is (radius^2)*(mph)*(1.92). That's (1.69^2)(110)(1.92) for this blower's 110 MPH and 3 3/8" pipe, with the result arriving right at the rated number of 600 CFM. Anyway, the Worx has enough volume and speed to blow mounds of wet leaves from six feet and dry ones from ten or more. It's impressively powerful. I was switching arms every few minutes as they wore out from the backward force. Only some really baked-on mud would have benefited from a pipe-reducer attachment. Thanks to ape-like proportions or the secure fit of my spandex leaf-blowing onesie, clothing suction from the rear-directed air intake hasn't been a bother. ALTERNATIVES: I almost bought Toro's highly-rated "Ultra" combination blower to minimize bagging, but the vacuum functionality didn't seem that useful in videos. Maybe it'd be adequate to clean an enclosed deck area or a small yard with a scattering of dry leaves. For a larger yard, it looks like a time sink relative to a standalone mulcher. Likewise the blowing capacity, which, at 410 CFM, trails the Worx by quite a lot. Cordless tools were also tempting. There's a 20V DeWalt people seem to like that's rated at (a perhaps optimistic) 400 CFM. Because it's a similar fan design to the Worx, we can compare power directly. DeWalt's standard battery is 20V (or so we'll stipulate; it's closer to 18V under load) and 5 amp-hours, so we're looking at 100 watt-hours total output. 15 minutes of runtime translates to a sustained draw, best case, of 400W. Assuming 90% efficiency in the brushless motor, that's 360W actually moving air. (When new. Expect a performance drop over time and battery replacements by year three.) Compare this Worx: 12 amps at 120V equates to 1440 watts sustained, in this case feeding a 2-pole AC/DC motor that's perhaps 55% efficient. 12A is close to the maximum a device can reasonably expect from a typical 15A household socket. Even with nearly half of our power lost to heat and noise, the remaining 790W is over double what the DeWalt can manage. It's no coincidence that 600 CFM cordless blowers (Greenworks and Kobalt come to mind) have 80V/2.5Ah batteries with twice the DeWalt's capacity. Their runtime at full tilt? The same fifteen minutes, with three extra pounds to lug around from a chunk of lithium that costs more than the blower it attaches to. And what of gas blowers? The handheld versions have around 1 HP with CFM from 450 to 500. They're usually tuned for higher MPH than the Worx, so they're likely to be a little better with wet leaves and a little worse with dry ones. Backpack blowers up the displacement and make between 1.5 and 5 horsepower. The models that you might find on the back of a professional landscaper can manage nearly 1000 CFM with speeds around 200 MPH. That's a considerable difference, but you pay for it at the checkout and in weight: figure 10 pounds or so for a handheld (relative to 7ish for this unit, plus some cord) and 20 or more for a backpack. As of mid-2020, two other corded blowers are worth a hard look: Toro's F700 and Worx's WG521. The Toro arrived first in 2019 with a hefty 720 CFM rating, a bigger two-arm handle, and a better cord retention mechanism. The WG521 is the response: 800 CFM and 135 MPH (claimed) from a ~4" nozzle, albeit still intended for one arm. All three blowers are beastly and often close in price; pick whichever best channels your inner Tim Allen. ACCESSORIES: A motor this powerful benefits from a thick (low gauge) cord for longer runs. You lose a bit of performance with thinner cord. The generic orange 50-foot extension everyone has is 16-gauge. Feeding a 12A load for 50 feet, it'll have a voltage drop of about 5V. Heavier 14-gauge loses 2.5V on the same run, and industrial 12-gauge, only 1.5V. The scale is linear, so if you double up that 16-gauge cord for a 100-foot run, you'll lop off 10V. How's that play out here? From a short and fat cable (that the cheesy plastic strain-relief piece won't actually accommodate; just tie an overhand knot over the two plugs instead), we'd expect a 1440W draw (12A * 120V, or a bit less because the house wiring itself has some drop). Losing 5V drops the total to 1380W. That's about what I found when I tested the Worx with a watt meter. 12ag / 3 ft = 1423W 14ag / 100 ft = 1352W 16ag / 50 ft = 1351W 16ag / 50 ft + 14ag / 100 ft = 1280W With the progressive thumb dial at the lowest setting, minimum draw was 260W. For shorter runs, disconnect extensions you don't actively need. Every cable sheds a percentage of the energy it carries to heat. As above, skinny cables lose more. Coiled on the ground and coupled with a high-load device like the Worx, they can build up enough heat to start melting insulation, which tends to cause sheepish expressions and insurance claims. This blower is also loud enough to merit hearing protection. On an A-weighted scale (approximating human hearing), measured outdoors from three feet, it makes 82 dB on low and 91 dB on high. Indoors or near a wall, volume jumps by 10 dB and subjectively doubles. While the sound character emulates a vacuum, my Shark only measures 72 dB indoors; you'd have to run over a rat's nest of lamp cords to make one this loud. Amazon has a number of comfortable muffs for less than a Jackson that'll keep your ears intact. You can find electric blowers with more toys, but few that'll get the job done as fast as this one. It's a bargain at the asking price. I'll update if I catch any reliability problems.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 1, 2016
R
Verified Purchase
R. Klein
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Light, and easy to use for blowing leaves
I bought this in the fall of 2025, and found it very easy to use. I also have a Toro blower/vac, that I use to grind up leaves in the fall. While this appliance is only good for blowing leaves, it does a good job of it. It's quieter than the Toro, and considerably lighter in weight. I find it much less fatiguing on the hand than the Toro. It has multiple speeds, so is versatile. You don't ALWAYS want maximum wind from these things, depending on the job and the space. The weight, comfortable handle, balance, and lower noise are the top advantages to this machine. Because this is a corded model, there's no concern over battery life. You can blow the afternoon away without a care. Only time will tell when it comes to durability. 🤞🏻
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
Teng Ma
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Power for the Price
Really impressed with this blower. It’s lightweight, easy to handle, and has plenty of power to clear grass and leaves quickly. Perfect for quick yard cleanups. Definitely worth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2026
O
Verified Purchase
Over and Under
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
The Black and Decker BESTA510 is a KEEPER plus it's made in the USA 🇺🇲
Style: String Trimmer
Well folks🙂 I have to tell you this has been a nice weed eater that cuts really good and it's LIGHTWEIGHT and it's powerful👍 and at a PRICE that can't be beat...it's way more powerful than some battery and electric weed eaters that I have.. like a Ryobi... And supposedly a commercial grade Ryobi $200 😤.. Anyway 🙂 This electric weed eater is very good and I'll take that PEPSI challenge any day 😀 when comparing it to some other weed eaters PLUS it doesn't USE LINE like other electric weed eaters that I've used.. at least that's been my experience.. This is a KEEPER weed eater from Black & Decker👍....it handles tall grass and even some hedge... though it probably shouldn't be used for hedge but it's TOUGH 😀 and better than any battery weed eater I used especially with the power and cutting... The power alone and convenience of NOT rushing through the job with the battery pack and charging ect imo is worth the cord drag 🙂... and much better than a battery weed eater or other electric weed eaters.. This just cuts better 👍... With MORE power consistently and constantly through the whole job... So in conclusion 🙂 the Black & Decker BESTA510 weed eater in my opinion is a KEEPER and this model has been around for a while which speaks for itself not to mention Black & Decker has been around for years.... This weed eater OVERALL (pound for pound ) is a solid performer with many mostly liking this weed eater and Black & Decker products overall.. Thanks for reading🙂.. I hope my review helps... and Did I mention It's made in the USA...🇺🇲..🙂...
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 6, 2025

recommand products