SKU: 86498543858

Elf Team Tyrrell 003 - 1971 British Grand Prix

Sale price$10122.75 Regular price$11247.50
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $2811.88 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 6 - Aug 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Elf Team Tyrrell 003 - 1971 British Grand PrixLimited to just 99 pieces As raced to victory by Jackie Stewart in the XXIV The Woolmark British Grand Prix at Silverstone Circuit on the 17th of July 1971 Each model hand built and assembled by a small team of craftsmen 1: 8 scale model, over 52 cms 20 inches long Made using the finest quality materials Over 4500 hours to develop the model Over 450 hours to build each model Thousands of precisely engineered parts: castings, photo etchings and CNC

  • Limited to just 99 pieces
  • As raced to victory by Jackie Stewart in the XXIV The Woolmark British Grand Prix at Silverstone Circuit on the 17th of July 1971
  • Each model hand-built and assembled by a small team of craftsmen
  • 1:8 scale model, over 52 cms/20 inches long
  • Made using the finest quality materials
  • Over 4500 hours to develop the model
  • Over 450 hours to build each model
  • Thousands of precisely engineered parts: castings, photo-etchings and CNC machined metal components
  • Built from CAD data developed after scanning the original chassis 003
  • Officially licensed and endorsed by Team Tyrrell Racing
  • The dominant car that claimed Tyrrell Racing’s place in the Formula 1 history, the Elf Team Tyrrell 003 was a development of the very fast but unreliable 001. The 003 claimed the team’s first victory in its debut race, enabled Jackie Stewart to claim his second World Drivers’ Championship, and secured Elf Team Tyrrell their only Constructors’ Championship.

    During the 1970 Formula One season, after he became disenchanted with the poor performance of the March Engineering chassis, and under pressure from Matra demanding he cease using Ford engines, Ken Tyrrell decided to build his own racing car. Employing ex-Ferguson designer Derek Gardner, who had worked on the Matra MS84 in 1969, the Tyrrell 001 car was designed and built in complete secrecy firstly at Gardner’s home, then at Tyrrell’s lumberyard in Surrey, as the team continued racing with the March chassis in the meantime. The 001 proved to be undependable, with Jackie Stewart failing to reach the chequered flag in any of its races during the latter stages of the 1970 season, though the sheer pace of the chassis was apparent as Stewart had led each race at some stage before retiring. After the season had finished, Gardner redesigned some sections of the car, altering the airbox, remodelling the nose section, lengthening the wheelbase and slightly narrowing the monocoque. In addition, Gardner had revised the front suspension, using a one-piece wishbone. Tyrrell continued to use the well-established Cosworth DFV V8 engine with 3.0 litre displacement; the power transmission was a five-speed Hewland FG40 gearbox. The team also switched tyre supplier to Goodyear after Dunlop withdrew from Formula 1.

    The redesigned car ultimately birthed three different chassis known as 002, 003 and 004. For the 1971 season, François Cevert would pilot 002 and Jackie Stewart would race the 003, whilst 004 was not completed until later in the year. Cevert’s car was actually the first of the two new Tyrrells built for the 1971 season. Very much a development of the original car, 002 and 003 featured a thinner gauge aluminium for the monocoque skin but also additional safety features like sturdier roll-over bars. The 002 also had a slightly longer wheelbase to accommodate for Cevert’s taller frame. Initially, the two new Tyrrells looked similar to the 001 but the shape was developed during the season. A third car, 004, was built later in the year but only served as a spare.

    In the hands of Stewart, the 003 was dominant. Debuting at the second race of the season in Spain, the Scotsman qualified in fourth position and, after a close battle with Jacky Ickx of Scuderia Ferrari, went on to win. A remarkable achievement in only Tyrrell’s fifth race as a constructor. The next race at the Monaco Grand Prix saw Stewart starting in pole position and securing an even more domineering victory, despite the heat in the cockpit giving him nausea by the race’s end. There was a brief reality check in the Dutch Grand Prix at Zandvoort, as Stewart could only manage eleventh in treacherous conditions, but he would bounce back in style. From the Dutch Grand Prix onwards, both cars were fitted with a black air-box, forcing more air into the intakes of the Cosworth DFV engine, improving cooling and giving the team a straight-line speed advantage that no other could match. Stewart took full advantage, taking consecutive victories in France, Britain and Germany. A violent accident took Stewart out of the running in Austria, his left rear driveshaft breaking and tearing the wheel from the 003. Fortunately, both driver and chassis only suffered minor injuries. Such was his lead in the standings that Ickx’s retirement saw Stewart become World Champion without evening needing to finish the race. Three races remained in the season, but the newly crowned champion retired from the following Italian Grand Prix due to an engine failure. He followed this up with a victory in Canada, in what was the first case of a red flag in Formula1: the race was red flagged after 64 laps due to thick fog descending onto the circuit. In the season’s final race at Watkins Glen, Stewart struggled with tyre wear but acted as the ultimate team player, waving through his young teammate Cevert and holding his rivals up for another three laps. Cevert would go on to take his maiden victory, sealing a perfect season for the team. In the team’s first full season, Elf Team Tyrrell finished first in the World Constructors’ Championship, scoring more than twice as many points as their nearest rival.

    Stewart would go onto to win another two victories in the 003 during the 1972 season but, with Emerson Fittipaldi behind the wheel of the newly designed Team Lotus 72D, these victories only came when the Lotus retired. The 003 was itself withdrawn and replaced by the new generation Tyrrell 005 towards end of the season. It was retained by Tyrrell and used for promotional purposes before it was entrusted to Tom Wheatcroft. He put it on display for many years in his spectacular Donington Grand Prix Collection museum. More recently, it was acquired by Jackie Stewart’s sons, Paul and Mark, who have regularly demonstrated the car at events like the Goodwood Festival of Speed.

    Overall, the Tyrrell 003 earned eight Grand Prix victories, a further podium, six pole positions and five fastest laps, scoring 78 points across two seasons and winning both the 1971 World Drivers' Championship and the 1971 International Cup for F1 Manufacturers.

    This fine 1:8 scale model of Tyrrell 003 replicates the car raced to victory by Jackie Stewart in the XXIV The Woolmark British Grand Prix at Silverstone Circuit on the 17th of July 1971. Stewart qualified second, behind the Ferrari of Clay Regazzoni and ahead of the BRM of Jo Siffert and the Lotus of Emerson Fittipaldi, the foursome separated by less than two hundredths of a second.

    The start itself was a shambles, with a bungled flag drop causing a collision between Jackie Oliver’s McLaren and the Brabham of Graham Hill, for which Oliver was fined £50. The Ferraris of Regazzoni and Jackie Ickx started the quickest, the Belgian having stolen in behind his team-mate from the third row, but they immediately had Stewart hard on their heels. It took Stewart just a single lap to dispose of Ickx, and two laps to claim the lead from Regazzoni. Whilst the rest of the drivers tussled behind him, Stewart increased his lead to 18 seconds by lap 20 of 68. The Scotsman cruised home and extended his lead in the Championship to 23 points with only five races remaining. Such was Stewart’s domination that only two cars finished on the lead lap, the closest thirty-six seconds behind.

    This model has been handcrafted utilising our own CAD data created by scanning the original 003 chassis in every detail, with the assistance of the Tyrrell family. The resulting prototype has undergone strict scrutiny to ensure complete accuracy.

    The Tyrrell 003 is limited to 99 pieces at 1:8 scale.

    Shipping Notes
    • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
    • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
    • Delivery to the USA:
    1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
    • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
    Exchange/Return Notes
    • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
    • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
    • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
    • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
    SKU: 86498543858

    Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

    Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

    4.5 ★★★★★
    Based on 23 reviews
    Sort
    Highest Rating
    Newest First
    Oldest First
    Product Reviews
    N
    Verified Purchase
    Nicky Pendleton
    Pawtucket, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Best Comentary for the layman/bible teacher
    Format: Hardcover
    The PNTC comentaries never dissapoint, they are the very best comentarys that i have found for those who do not read greek and may have a bit of bible college.. they are technical but not too technical, in depth but not too much. and you can always trust the General Editor DA Carson... i have several other comentary series but this is the best and all of them are rated very highly by the experts..
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on November 22, 2023
    A
    Verified Purchase
    Amazon Customer
    Massapequa, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Very thorough Commentary
    I would rank this among the best commentaries I have read on 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus. A nice balabnce between academic and pastoral discussions.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2022
    M
    Marie
    Draper, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Concise yet thorough treatment of the difficult passages.
    Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
    Excellent, balanced, thorough treatment of the pastoral epistles. Highly recommended. Note: Customer 7 above is incorrect in stating that Yarbrough doesn’t reference or quote Hubner on 1 Tim 2:12. You will find Hubner on pages 175 and 176.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2025
    B
    Bill Muehlenberg
    Birmingham, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Another welcome Pillar commentary
    Format: Hardcover
    The newest volume in the excellent Pillar New Testament Commentary series is another first-rate effort. The American New Testament professor has already done a very good commentary on 1-3 John (BECNT, 2008). His newest commentary adds to a now rather impressive line-up of Pillar commentaries. As to the Pastorals, the four most important and substantial commentaries from a basically conservative, evangelical stance over the past few decades have been these: 1992: George Knight (NIGTC – 500 pages) 2000: Jerome Quinn and William Wacker (ECC – 900 pages) 2000: William Mounce (WBC – 640 pages) 2006: Philip Towner (NICNT – 900 pages) Mention should also be made of two other commentaries. One is the 1999 volume by I. Howard Marshall (with Philip Towner) in the ICC series. It is also 900 pages and looks to be outstanding. But I do not own it (the ICC series is SO expensive), so I cannot comment further on it. Another is the shorter, 300+ page work by Gordon Fee (NIBC, 1984) which can also be added to any list of highly recommended volumes on the Pastorals. Now we have Yarbrough to join these important works. He provides us with a very workable, informed and detailed examination of the Pastoral Epistles. He spends 95 of his 600 pages on introductory matters. As to authorship, it has become somewhat trendy of late to deny Pauline authorship. Even some conservatives have gone in this direction Yarbrough offers ten pages on this, and affirms the traditional stance, saying: “For eighteen centuries, Pauline authorship was never doubted by the churches’ intellectual leaders; even in the last two centuries, many have doubted the doubters.” As to the commentary proper, one tends to first head to well-known, contentious, difficult, or important passages. So let me reflect on a few of these. One of the most hotly debated passages in the Pastorals of course has to do with the matter of women in leadership. Paul covers this in several places, but the most crucial passage is 1 Timothy 2:11-15. This is certainly a difficult passage in many respects, and one that is hotly debated. The two main camps on this have been the complementarians, who argue that men and women are equal in worth and status, but have differing, hierarchical roles, and the egalitarians, who argue that women can fully serve in church leadership positions. This debate has been going on for quite some time now. Because all of 1 Tim. 2 must be considered here (dealing as it does with propriety in public worship), Yarbrough has a lengthy general discussion about these issues first. He then devotes another 20 pages to the actual contentious passage. He offers a “qualified complementarian reading” on all this. Egalitarians may not fully agree, but they should appreciate his careful and gracious exegesis here. And of course he has written on this elsewhere, as in his chapter in the important volume edited by Kostenberger and Schreiner: Women in the Church, 3rd ed. (Crossway, 1995, 2016). Another issue that can be rather difficult to understand and deal with concerns those who “have suffered shipwreck with regard to the faith. Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme” (1 Tim 1:18-20). Paul says something similar in 1 Cor. 5. Says Yarbrough, “From these two passages it may be inferred that in grave cases of ethical or doctrinal lapse, and perhaps drawing on Job 2:6, Satan was viewed as ‘God’s agent in judicial administration.’ Whereas congregations would normally have prayed for one another, there were evidently cases where petition would shift from divine protection to divine discipline (with Satan as God’s agent). Sometimes harsh measures are required to wake people up (see 2 Thess. 3:10-14).” Since discussions about overseers are found in all three epistles, both Paul and Yarbrough spend much time on the topic. In one of the passages he makes this remark: “In sum, ‘the overseer is to be’ introduces more than a random wish list for the pastorally inclined do-gooder. It points to a quality and depth of godliness that are indiscernible for the magnitude and gravity of pastoral labor that Paul models, expects of Timothy, and hopes to see replicated in generations to come at Ephesus and beyond.” Two more issues that can be contentious for some is found in 1 Tim. 5:23: “Stop drinking only water, and use a little wine because of your stomach and your frequent illnesses.” Some teetotallers try to argue that this is not actual wine, but watered down grape juice. And some of the health and wealth gospellers insist that no faith-filled believer should ever get sick. Yarbrough gives short shrift to both of these ideas. Another famous passage dealing with wealth is 1 Tim. 6:6-10 which speaks of false teachers and the love of money. Yarbrough affirms the biblical balance Paul seeks to present here: “Birth and death both illustrate the tenuous relation between life and material goods. Paul wants to relativize (not trivialize or eliminate) the importance of earthly acquisitions, since he observes people tempted to enlist God in their material quest. . . . It is important to note that this is not an adoption of an ideal of Hellenistic philosophy. Nor is it an endorsement of poverty. . . . If God does grant wealth, and if a believer has not sold his or her soul to acquire it, Paul will later give directions for its proper utilization (see on vv. 17-19 below).” Other matters could be mentioned here. But all up this is a very competent and usable commentary, one that will stand the test of time. It offers careful exegesis and helpful theological insights. It is a very welcome addition to the Pillar series. The PNTC series really has become one of the premier sets for evangelicals and those who want the best of biblical scholarship and careful exegesis.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on November 11, 2018
    J
    Jimmy R. Reagan
    Houston, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Great, New Commentary!
    Format: Hardcover
    This commentary by Robert Yarbrough will become, I predict, a top-rated volume on the Pastoral Epistles. These epistles are ideal for the style of commentary we find in the Pillar New Testament Commentary (PNTC) series. As respected and valuable as the NICNT volumes by the same publisher are, these Pillar volumes are simply more valuable. They have a better center of focus, are more consistently conservative, and have more value for pastors without sacrificing scholarship. This volume succeeds in reaching that standard too. As you might have guessed, the editorship of D. A. Carson likely keeps this series moored to that lofty perch. BTW, don’t miss the editor’s preface where Carson fawns over Yarbrough’s work here. I was in love with this commentary within a few pages of its fine Introduction. So many commentators lose their way in the Pastoral Epistles. I have long suspected that it has far more to do with the authors dislike of what these epistles say rather than any actual problem found within them. Yarbrough is not sucked into the irrational fear of using the term “pastoral epistles” as so many are today either. It’s a breath of fresh air. He opens the Introduction with eight theses on pastoral heritage in these epistles. To my mind, that was a great way to present introductory issues. Next, he does a section each on Father, Son, and Spirit respectively in the Pastoral Epistles (PE). He was particularly perceptive in discussing Paul as a working pastor, even dispensing some silly critical theories along the way. He then tackles in turn geography, people, and key terms. He ends with a section on authorship and other usual introductory matters and masterfully reaches conservative conclusions. The commentary itself was even better! The phrase “real help” comes to mind. He showed off his skill, for example, in the perpetual battlefield of Titus 2. He gently yet surefootedly takes us where that disliked passage goes. He’s kind to dissenters, careful in scholarship, but not afraid to reach a conclusion. I don’t know about you, but that’s how I like my commentaries. 5 stars all the way!
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on October 11, 2018

    recommand products